Guest blog by Andrew Handley, Architect
“I spend a great deal of time and money travelling to attend events. This means an event on my door step in Nottingham is a welcome break from trains, planes and automobiles, the boredom of which is only eased by gamification with Four Square!
Today’s event, held at the Space Nottingham Contemporary on my door step was a symposium entitled:
‘Fields + Tactics: the future of architectural praxis in our 21st Century’
The event was organised by Nottingham University School of the Built Environment, along with the Architectural and Tectonics Research Group and T&G, the student run architecture society at the University of Nottingham. The event was also supported from industry by the RIBA, Ibstock and Schock.
I’ll confess when I first saw the advert for the event I had to do a quick “define praxis” on Google! ‘Praxis’ put simply is accepted practice or custom.
The line up of speakers was broad and clearly, thought had gone into ensuring a narrative would be built up leading to the closing panel discussion.
There were three distinct sessions:
- Practice-Research Synergies
- Prototyping Performative Architecture
- Sustaining Urban Life
Angela Brady, president of the RIBA and director of Brady Mallalieu Architects , opened proceedings aptly covering all the session themes with thought points and also directly addressing students on the subject of debt and the need to look beyond the UK for job opportunities.
Discussions on Practice-Research Synergies was introduced by Tim MacFarlane of GLASS Engineers. Tim’s presentation took the audience through a potted history of structural glass, and how collaboration with Pilkington over 20 years has resulted in codes of practice for structural glass. The presentation highlighted the difficulties of leading innovation and the importance of building relationships with people that are skilled experts at manipulating materials. Tim concluded by showing GLASS Engineers best known work, the signature glass staircases found in Apple retail stores.
The Practice-Research Synergies session was continued by Billie Faircloth, Research Director at Kieran Timberlake. Billie managed to condense the essence of Kieran Timberlake’s research centred design approach into a 20 minute presentation, starting by explaining the core team of 7 individuals with diverse backgrounds and education, but a common interest in building better spaces and places. In part this approach is assisted by the structure of tertiary education in the USA that allows students to study different subjects at under graduate and post graduate, providing a broader range of fields. Billie explained the simple breaking down of design problems into input, output and feedback; faciliting finding pathways to problem solving. If the existing tools don’t work the group customise existing tools or build bespoke tools, extending to building and embedding sensors to amplify the input, output, feedback cycle. The presentation had the feel of a TED talk and I have since discovered Billie gave a TEDx talk in 2010.
Julian Marsh was left with the daunting task of summing up, and was bold and brave regarding the need to rethink the way architecture is taught in the UK and that Foundation courses should be considered opening up a broader intake of students as well as engaging with primary and secondary schools pupils.
The Prototyping Performative Architecture sessions provided an interesting contrast between the work of Frank Barkow, Barkow Leibinger Architeckten and Tom Emerson, 6a Architects.
Frank Barkow has pioneered the prototyping and fabrication of architecture with manufacturing, what might be described as scripting to scribing. This is an approach that is now becoming democratised at the small scale via MakerBot etc.
There is a strange discomfort, but common sense, to the machine fabrication of buildings and to an extent it’s a process that has come of age with affordable and powerful design software able to drive fabrication. Frank’s presentation repeated and reinforced points raised by Tim MacFarlane, especially the need to find industry partners to enable delivery.
Tom Emerson presented an approach to prototyping that was pure, thoughtful and stripped down. Tom described a challenge presented to students at the ETH Department of Architecture in Zurich of working with only timber pallets, nails and hammers. The focus was material transformation and collaboration as students had to cooperate to construct a space. For example how many nails are needed at intersections to ensure the structures own weight plus potential snow load is accounted for? The students had to use calculations to design out risk, but ultimately use the construction as a prototype to test.
Michael Stacey chaired the panel discussion for this session and challenged the speakers to think about how prototyping could be applied to solve real world and immediate challenges such as the need for housing and schools allied to eliminating fuel poverty. This was perhaps an unfair question for this point in proceedings and better suited to the closing panel discussion, but a great question that I hope will resonate in the minds of speakers and delegates alike.
The final session, Sustaining Urban Life, began with Hans van Heijden of Biq Architects, presenting a Dutch perspective of sustaining urban life. The work shown placed a strong emphasis on reusing urban fabric, respecting the past but not preserving the past. Hans demonstrated how the Blue Coat building in Liverpool was extended paying homage to the eclectic history and unique role the building plays in the cultural history of Liverpool. Hans had returned to the Blue Coat building 3 years after the project was completed taking photos of the space in use, including knocks, scrapes and weathering. This beautifully illustrated a slice of sustained urban live and how careful material choices helped.
In the absence of Julian Lewis of EAST Urban Designers and Architects, John Morgan from University of Nottingham School of the Built Environment stepped up and presented Julian’s Powerpoint stack. The presentation used Rainham to examine intervention in unexpected spaces such as the rear of a supermarket as well as more obvious but neglected space such as the river edge. The focus was people centric, acknowledging urban life can not hope to be sustained without people using spaces. This linked back to Hans’s photos of the Blue Coat building filled with people happily using the spaces.
So how is this all relevant to the aims and ambitions of Class of Your Own?
It turns out extremely relevant and it almost seems like stating the obvious that establishing AEC in the national curriculum will contribute to AEC praxis.
Lean economic times are making architects – and industry in general – rethink praxis and consequently elitist attitudes of old are eroding. Creating space and place increasingly needs to be responsive to the disruptive forces of climate and economy. The next generation of Architecture, Engineering and Construction professionals that Class of Your Own is fostering will have to work and operate across a range of fields, applying broad spectrum tactics that do not fit neatly in role based silos but rely on developing transferable skills.
The closing panel discussion delivered a bombshell, shock statement from Angela Brady, President of the RIBA. She concluded:
“Wouldn’t it be brilliant if architecture was on the national curriculum?”
<Many thanks to Andrew for this incredibly timely article! It’s quite clear that industry must do more to enlighten and engage young people to discover the built environment. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact alison@classofyourown.com. >